<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hey, what&#8217;s the big idea? Protecting your ideas when submitting them to a third party.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lawontherow.wordpress.com/2008/06/12/hey-whats-the-big-idea-protecting-your-ideas-when-submitting-them-to-a-third-party/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lawontherow.wordpress.com/2008/06/12/hey-whats-the-big-idea-protecting-your-ideas-when-submitting-them-to-a-third-party/</link>
	<description>The Entertainment Law Blog of Barry Neil Shrum</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 02:17:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION® &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Locking it down</title>
		<link>http://lawontherow.wordpress.com/2008/06/12/hey-whats-the-big-idea-protecting-your-ideas-when-submitting-them-to-a-third-party/#comment-276</link>
		<dc:creator>LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION® &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Locking it down</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 04:01:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawontherow.wordpress.com/2008/06/12/hey-whats-the-big-idea-protecting-your-ideas-when-submitting-them-to-a-third-party/#comment-276</guid>
		<description>[...] now an entertainment lawyer named Barry Neil Shrum who has written a pretty thoughtful piece on some approaches that actually might work.  It&#8217;s worth taking a look at.  But we must [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] now an entertainment lawyer named Barry Neil Shrum who has written a pretty thoughtful piece on some approaches that actually might work.  It&#8217;s worth taking a look at.  But we must [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Law Offices of Gordon P. Firemark - Entertainment Lawyers</title>
		<link>http://lawontherow.wordpress.com/2008/06/12/hey-whats-the-big-idea-protecting-your-ideas-when-submitting-them-to-a-third-party/#comment-265</link>
		<dc:creator>Law Offices of Gordon P. Firemark - Entertainment Lawyers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 04:03:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawontherow.wordpress.com/2008/06/12/hey-whats-the-big-idea-protecting-your-ideas-when-submitting-them-to-a-third-party/#comment-265</guid>
		<description>[...] Hey, what’s the big idea? Protecting your ideas when submitting them to a third party. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hey, what’s the big idea? Protecting your ideas when submitting them to a third party. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gordon Firemark</title>
		<link>http://lawontherow.wordpress.com/2008/06/12/hey-whats-the-big-idea-protecting-your-ideas-when-submitting-them-to-a-third-party/#comment-264</link>
		<dc:creator>Gordon Firemark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 03:54:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawontherow.wordpress.com/2008/06/12/hey-whats-the-big-idea-protecting-your-ideas-when-submitting-them-to-a-third-party/#comment-264</guid>
		<description>Good post.  Well thought out and researched! 

Your discussion of &quot;concrete and novel&quot; is right on.  This standard goes far beyond the congressional intent behind the copyright statute.  Congress used Novelty as a standard in Patent law... if they&#039;d intended it also for copyrights, they&#039;d have been explicit about it.

Also... it&#039;s Justice Potter Stewart, not Stewart Potter.

The conclusions drawn are correct,  but in practice, (at least here in Hollywood) Agents don&#039;t ever sign confidentiality agreements... after all, it&#039;s their job to get the material OUT, not keep it secret.

The usual practice in making submissions is to establish the paper trail, as you&#039;ve suggested, even if it&#039;s one-directional.

Finally, many studios, production companies, etc, will ask for a &quot;submission release&quot;...   In my practice, I always advise my clients Against signing such documents... they&#039;re essentially a &#039;license to steal&#039;, and always a big mistake.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post.  Well thought out and researched! </p>
<p>Your discussion of &#8220;concrete and novel&#8221; is right on.  This standard goes far beyond the congressional intent behind the copyright statute.  Congress used Novelty as a standard in Patent law&#8230; if they&#8217;d intended it also for copyrights, they&#8217;d have been explicit about it.</p>
<p>Also&#8230; it&#8217;s Justice Potter Stewart, not Stewart Potter.</p>
<p>The conclusions drawn are correct,  but in practice, (at least here in Hollywood) Agents don&#8217;t ever sign confidentiality agreements&#8230; after all, it&#8217;s their job to get the material OUT, not keep it secret.</p>
<p>The usual practice in making submissions is to establish the paper trail, as you&#8217;ve suggested, even if it&#8217;s one-directional.</p>
<p>Finally, many studios, production companies, etc, will ask for a &#8220;submission release&#8221;&#8230;   In my practice, I always advise my clients Against signing such documents&#8230; they&#8217;re essentially a &#8216;license to steal&#8217;, and always a big mistake.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
